Category: Business Strategy

Posted on

The High Cost of Poor Communication: Understanding the Impact of Strategy Misalignment

Failure to Communicate Strategy Clearly

Failure to communicate strategy clearly is not a “soft” issue. The execution tax requires businesses to make daily payments through delayed decision-making and continuous work and loss of skilled workers. Leaders who do not effectively communicate strategy enable their teams to develop their own interpretations about their work. The process of guessing results in business drift and waste while causing organizations to lose potential revenue.

The real cost of fuzzy strategy

Most employees don’t truly get the plan. Big internal communications research found that 56% of leaders confirmed employees grasp the organization’s strategic direction and its vision and purpose but only 47% confirmed staff members understand their work’s value to the organization. (Gallagher)

Engagement drops when clarity drops. The United States reached its lowest employee engagement point since 2014 when 31% of workers stayed engaged during 2024 which resulted in slower operations and worse customer service. Clear strategy is a lever you control. (Gallup.com)

The practice of communication needs people to learn specific skills instead of depending on public meetings for its operation. The HBR provides direct advice to transform complex decisions into simple language which should be distributed through multiple communication channels while providing employees with concrete actions to take. (Harvard Business Review)

What “unclear” looks like on the ground

You’ll identify three distinct patterns.

  1. Competing priorities. Teams dedicate their efforts to move forward with projects that do not fulfill organizational objectives. They move, but not together.
  2. Decisions stall. A lack of common direction between teams leads to longer approval processes and increased risks and delayed project timelines.
  3. “Exec-speak” wins. The strategy needs slides to be successfully repeated by others. If they can’t say it, they can’t do it.

McKinsey’s view aligns: strategy creates potential; mobilization captures it. Champions focus their work on removing delivery barriers instead of developing complex strategic plans. (McKinsey & Company)

The organization maintains a core operational pattern which delivers strategic information to all its stakeholder groups.

Use this weekly cadence. It’s small, boring, and it works.

1) Boil strategy down to “3 choices.” The document should contain three essential elements which include the customers you will acquire and the problems you will resolve and the capabilities you will develop (along with your limitations). The information needs to be presented in a way that new employees can understand. Use it in onboarding and sales. (Template: [Internal Link 1].)

2) Translate choices into two layers of action.

The system requires three to five quarterly bets which need to produce measurable results such as onboarding time reduction by 40% during Q2.

  • Weekly moves: the smallest actions that advance each bet. Name owners. Track in public.

3) Build a rolling comms loop.

  • Monday: CEO note—what matters this week and why.
  • Wednesday: AMAs or floor walks; answer the same three questions: What changed?What’s next?What will we stop?

The operator will show the strategy through a 5-minute video presentation which will take place on Friday.

4) Make managers the message. Every manager should receive a 10-minute “strategy huddle” kit which includes a one-pager and three proof points and one customer story. Reward managers who convert organizational strategy into operational plans which their teams can execute. (Manager kit: [Internal Link 2].)

5) Close the loop with evidence. Every betting decision needs to be linked to customer behavior or financial market indicators. The company achieved SAR 420 savings per customer through support touchpoints after reducing onboarding time from 12 days to 7 days. The results need to show their connection to margin and churn performance instead of using vanity metrics.

The HBR playbook recommends organizations to use repetition with storytelling and action-oriented paths instead of depending on slogans. Use it as your checklist. (Harvard Business Review)

GCC context: transformation raises the clarity bar.

The GCC leaders have started multiple fast-paced transformation programs which they are executing at an unprecedented speed. Middle East CEOs maintain positive views about business growth but their operations encounter major obstacles from artificial intelligence and shifting market trends which force them to concentrate on essential choices instead of generating excessive data. Make your strategy translation local: policies, partners, and capabilities on Saudi timelines and budgets. (PwC)

Organizations need to establish a “strategy change note” process for funding and scope adjustments which requires immediate documentation of all modifications within 72 hours. The document requires three core sections to explain modifications along with their causes and operational effects on frontline activities. The fast development of trust through consistent behavior works well in markets that experience significant change.

How to know you communicate strategy clearly

The board needs to track these four vital signals throughout each month.

1) Strategy recall rate. In random 60-second spot checks, ask employees to state the three choices. The system needs to achieve at least 80% accuracy in recognizing all its functions. Use pulse tools to sample at scale.

2) Line-of-sight score. Ask: “I know how my work advances our strategy.”Target ≥85% “agree/strongly agree.”The risk level of your organization depends on how far headquarters operations stretch from field operations.

3) Decision latency. Organizations need to monitor the time span which passes between submitting proposals and making go/no-go decisions for their strategic bets. Aim to cut it by 30–50%. The system needs more data to establish when latency starts increasing.

4) Rework rate and duplicate work. The analysis needs to evaluate planned work duration against actual work duration to determine which projects ended because their objectives no longer aligned. The team shows full comprehension through their Falling rework metric results.

Gallup’s research shows engagement and performance move when leaders set clear expectations and maintain meaningful, frequent conversations. Your strategy rhythm is how you do that. (Gallup.com)

Scripts you can steal

  • All-hands opener (30 seconds): “Our strategy consists of three essential elements which include winning certain games and solving particular problems and developing specific capabilities. This quarter we’re betting on [A, B, C]. The assignment for this week includes [X, Y, Z]. You can determine your work contribution by asking your manager or by sharing your question in the AMA channel at present.
  • Manager huddle (10 minutes): The presentation includes one slide about the three available options and separate slides for each bet which show customer effects and each team member gets one minute to explain their weekly decision and the team conducts one blocker round.

The one-page change note contains the following information:

The document includes information about what changes need to occur and their current timing and specific areas to stop and measurement methods and ownership responsibilities and assessment timelines. Share within 72 hours.

If you remember one thing

Don’t write a bigger plan. Build a smaller system. The company needs to deliver its strategy to all staff members through their managers each week while showing evidence of achieved results. People who can repeat the strategy will execute it which leads to SAR-denominated financial returns.

References:

Internal Links

https://3msbusiness.cloud/the-dangers-of-short-term-thinking-in-long-term-strategy/

https://3msbusiness.cloud/turnaround-strategy-stabilize-simplify-scale/

External Links

  • External 1 — Harvard Business Review, How to Communicate Your Company’s Strategy Effectively (2022) (Harvard Business Review)
  • External 2 — Gallagher, State of the Sector 2022/23 (2023) (Gallagher)
  • External 3 — Gallup, Employee engagement sinks to a 10-year low (2025) (Gallup.com)
  • External 4 — McKinsey, How strategy champions win (2025) (McKinsey & Company)
  • External 5 — PwC, 28th CEO Survey: Middle East findings (2025) (PwC)

Get an extra 20% discount upon subscription at Hostinger webhosting:

https://hostinger.com?REFERRALCODE=F4NMUSTAFHIS

Posted on

The Dangers of Short-Term Thinking in Long-Term Strategy

The Dangers of Short-Term Thinking in Long-Term Strategy

Introductory

Your company runs its operations mainly through its calendar system instead of its strategic plans.

Businesses need to determine their pricing strategies at the end of every quarter. The system begins its resource requests by using projected data for its operations. Board decks rewrite priorities. The result? Short-term achievements which provide immediate satisfaction will eventually lead to long-term costs that slow down development.

This isn’t a moral failing. It’s a system problem. Leaders choose short-term gains through incentives and operating cadences and investor communication because these elements require them to deliver immediate results despite their knowledge of superior long-term results. Left alone, the urgent eats the important.

A step-by-step guide exists to restore equilibrium between short-term goals and long-term objectives which will help you achieve your quarter targets without harming your decade-long vision.

The financial impact of short-term thinking has quantifiable effects that businesses can measure.

Short-term thinking exists as an easily recognizable phenomenon. You can see it in four places:

  1. Capex drift. The expenses for maintenance operations and basic operations maintenance have increased but new capital expenditures for growth have stopped. The company shows declining cash flow in the future but EBITDA remains strong.
  2. Commercial discounting. Teams pull deals forward with price cuts. Revenue sticks. Gross margin doesn’t.
  3. Talent mix. Senior hires replace capability bets. Contractors rise. R&D cycles shorten. You save OpEx; you lose optionality.
  4. Portfolio sameness. Bets cluster around the core. New S-curves receive no “shots on goal”.

Your dashboards should display only one metric at a time because showing multiple metrics leads to optimizing the scoreboard instead of the actual game.

Why It Happens (Even to Great Teams)

The current compensation system provides employees with annual performance bonuses and option vesting schedules that lead to short-term performance results.

  • Disclosure pressure: Quarterly guidance becomes a cage. You control the story but not the financial aspects.

The board dedicates 80% of its time to the previous quarter but devotes only 20% to the upcoming decade.

  • Metric mix: You track P&L, but not leading indicators like cycle time, innovation throughput, or NPS-to-LTV lift.

The system needs transformation to achieve new behavioral patterns from people.

The 3-Clock Operating Model

The company should operate under three time-based systems which were established during the design phase.

  • Clock 1 (12 weeks): Execution. The main performance indicators consist of pipeline quality and cash conversion and unit economics and working capital turns.
  • Clock 2 (12–24 months): Scaling. The company needs to expand its product-market reach and increase capacity while moving platforms and establish its position in the market category.
  • Clock 3 (5–10 years): Optionality. The report presents new S-curves and frontier technologies and market entry strategies and moats which produce compound effects.

Each clock operates independently with its own set of objectives and financial allocations and management structure. Never let one meeting cover all three. The process of switching between different tasks leads to the death of long-term strategic planning.

Six Moves to Rebalance Now

1. Rewrite incentives for time horizon.

The system needs payment to operate its efficiency management system and execute plans. The current decade requires investment to achieve three essential goals: fast innovation development and long-lasting customer value and high talent concentration. The company needs to establish performance targets spanning three years which will connect to TSR and two additional non-monetary performance indicators (on-time product releases and essential personnel retention).

2. Publish capital allocation rules.

The pre-commitment to ranges should be set at X% for core, Y% for scale-up and Z% for options. The divestment process needs to follow established hurdle rates rather than political factors. Your external communication about compounding value will draw in investors who focus on this investment approach.

3. Set a “no-surprise” guidance policy.

The company needs to create a wide performance band for each year which includes particular targets for the long-term period (e.g., “We will maintain R&D expenses at 12–14% of revenue throughout the cycle”). Your long-term strategy will take precedence over your short-term quarterly results in the market.

4. Institutionalize Strategy Days.

Two board meetings per year cover only Clock 3. No operational decks. The company should focus on developing three main areas which include scenarios, moat health, platform bets and talent bench for upcoming business ventures. The team needs to perform pre-reads to examine both decision memos and kill-lists that contain zombie projects.

5. Set up a Long-Term Scorecard.

Alongside GAAP/IFRS, show:

o          The number of new features released each quarter which users adopted at least 30% of the time.

o          Customer equity (NPS trend × LTV/CAC trajectory).

The time span from when a company decides to launch a product until it reaches store shelves constitutes the capacity lead time.

o          Optionality index (share of capex on S-curve bets with defined learning milestones).

The long-term value increases through compounding when these factors become better even though a single quarter may not produce results.

  1. Time protection requires governance systems instead of depending on willpower.

The students should dedicate their time to specific days for each clock as follows: Clock 1 gets Mon/Tue and Clock 2 gets Wed and Clock 3 gets Thu. Guard it with EA and COO support. Make exceptions rare and explicit.

A Simple 90-Day Plan

Days 1–30: Diagnose.

Run a “time-horizon audit.”The actual destination of last year’s dollars and leadership hours and board agenda minutes remains unknown. Segment P&L and capex by clocks. Three major obstacles need to be addressed which include low-yield discounts and an overloaded roadmap and stalled market entry.

Days 31–60: Decide.

Approve capital allocation rules and the long-term scorecard. Choose two bets to increase their value and two projects to terminate. The executive incentive system needs a total redesign to establish two performance metrics which serve as predictive indicators.

Days 61–90: Do.

Publish guidance guardrails. Host your first Strategy Day. Launch a monthly options review for Clock 3 with binary “advance/kill” calls. Explain to the Street which metrics you will track along with your reasons for doing so.

The process of investor communication requires a strategic approach to maintain clarity during discussions.

Most investors aren’t anti-long-term; they’re anti-surprise. Give them a clean story:

  • Where compounding comes from. Network effects? Switching costs? Learning curve?
  • How you will fund it through cycles. Clear ranges for reinvestment and leverage.
  • What you will not cut. The “untouchables” that protect the flywheel.
  • When you’ll change your mind. Objective tripwires that trigger pivots.

This builds credibility. Credibility lowers your cost of capital. Lower cost of capital buys time.

The Founder/CFO Edge

The founders will defend the mission. The position of CFO grants access to protect financial information. Your collective work will establish a system that develops leadership through short-term accomplishments. The best companies do both:

They finished the quarter by winning all their matches.

The path they establish will inevitably result in the approaching decade.

Not by heroic effort. By design.

References

https://3msbusiness.cloud/the-challenges-of-short-term-thinking-in-innovation/

https://3msbusiness.cloud/the-pitfalls-of-ignoring-customer-willingness-to-pay-in-innovation-strategy/

FCLTGlobal — “Research on Long-Term Value Creation.”2020–2025. https://www.fcltglobal.org/research/

Saudi Vision 2030 — “Vision 2030 (Economic Transformation Agenda).”2016–ongoing (accessed 2025). https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/

Subscribe to Hostinger (web hosting) and get 20% Discount with the following link:

https://hostinger.com?REFERRALCODE=F4NMUSTAFHIS

Posted on

Understanding Unrealistic Pricing Ambitions in Business

Introductory

The standard functions as a practical rule which prevents businesses from using “+X%” pricing models while allowing them to implement value-based pricing adjustments. Accept (N) or (A–B). The assessment includes tests and math sections as well as corridors and KSA/GCC guardrails.

Accept: (N) or (A–B)

Why this exists

The statement “Let’s add 10% this quarter” seems powerful at first but it usually results in lost credibility and decreased volume and permanent damage to profit margins. The concept of ambition functions independently from pricing strategy because business decisions stem from value and demand signals and competitive market conditions. The policy in Unrealistic Pricing Ambitions defines price changes as requiring data support and operational feasibility and legal compliance. The post-inflation market creates difficulties because customers have different price sensitivity levels while competitors quickly adjust their prices and customers remember previous instances of receiving poor value for their money. Our standard demands that companies stay away from slide-deck pricing methods while they conduct systematic test-and-learn approaches for all KSA/GCC market operations.

Scope

Applies to all list prices, fees, surcharges, discount ladders, and deal policies across enterprise, distributor, and retail channels in KSA/GCC. The plan introduces new product pricing which will be applied to all current stock-keeping units (SKUs).

Acceptance criteria (pick one)

  • N — Not acceptable: Ambition-led proposal (e.g., “target +12%”) with no quantified value, elasticity, or corridor, or no executable rollout plan.
  • A–B — Acceptable (with conditions): The proposal contains evidence-based data that includes EVC quantification and elasticity assessment and competitive corridor definition and complete unit economics calculations and execution strategy with performance monitoring systems.

The five tests (must pass for A–B)

  1. Value evidence (EVC) shows the financial outcomes of an investment compared to alternative uses of the same funds. Proposed price ≤ EVC by segment.
  2. Elasticity signal: Provide a defensible elasticity (tests, win/loss, mix-shift, or small-scale pilots). Price-volume trade-off must net positive at Base / −3pp / −5pp volume scenarios. https://3msbusiness.cloud/ignoring-price-elasticity-pnl-leaks/
  3. Businesses must create documented offer corridors or demonstrate premium value through measurable differentiators to achieve competitive sanity. Note expected countermoves and any KSA/GCC competition-law considerations. https://3msbusiness.cloud/pricing-architecture/
  4. Cost & contribution math: Use realized price after rebates/discounts. Show how contribution margin changes and breakeven volume shifts and cash flow effects throughout each month. https://3msbusiness.cloud/the-price-waterfall-where-margin-quietly-disappears/
  5. The execution capacity needs to validate all quote-tool rules and deal-desk guardrails and sales playcards and customer communications and monitoring systems. Anything missing = N.

Automatic N red flags

  • Round-number hikes (+5%, +10%, etc.) with no EVC or elasticity.

The price was determined by working backward from the revenue targets.

The implementation of one-size-fits-all price increases results in equal price changes for all market segments and all product SKUs.

The company will resolve discount problems while keeping the present share price system in place.

The research fails to examine how KSA/GCC market conduct functions through legal systems that use signaling and corridor coordination and below-cost foreclosure methods.

The math (what you must show)

  • Elasticity profit check:

Q1=Q0⋅(1+ϵ⋅ΔPP0),ΔProfit=(P1−C)Q1−(P0−C)Q0Q_1 = Q_0 \cdot \left(1 + \epsilon \cdot \frac{\Delta P}{P_0}\right), \quad \Delta \text{Profit} = (P_1 – C)Q_1 – (P_0 – C)Q_0

Approve only if ΔProfit>0\Delta \text{Profit} > 0 in Base and remains ≥0 in −3pp and −5pp volume stress.

  • EVC guardrail:

EVC=PriceNBA+(Savings+Revenue Uplift−Switching Cost)\text{EVC} = \text{Price}_{\text{NBA}} + (\text{Savings} + \text{Revenue Uplift} – \text{Switching Cost})

The proposed price should remain under the EVC threshold which applies to this market segment.

  • Corridor logic:

The system will display differentiators for each product when P1P_1 exceeds the corridor value but it will explain the reasoning behind the discount strategy when P1P_1 falls below the corridor value by showing penetration and lifetime value calculations and setting rules to limit discount exposure.

Operating procedure

  1. Create the INTERNAL—Pricing Brief document by adding the EVC and elasticity and corridor and waterfall exhibits to it.
  2. Review board: Pricing + Finance + Legal (GAC lens for KSA). The document contains three main sections which analyze risks and outline customer communication strategies and predict how competitors will react.
  3. The first step involves testing the new design through A/B testing or regional deployment with specific success criteria to determine if it should proceed to full implementation.
  4. Instrument tracking: Weekly: price realization, mix, win rate, churn, competitor moves.
  5. The project needs to restart from the beginning according to the kill/iterate rules when realization falls under 70% after four weeks or when the gross margin difference becomes less than 0.5 percentage points.

What “good” looks like (A–B example)

The EVC presents SAR 1,400 per year in customer savings compared to other options yet the proposed +6% (SAR +18/month) only captures less than 15% of the total value.

  • Elasticity: −0.8 from recent discount test. Base volume −4%, profit +SAR 1.1m; stress at −7% volume still +SAR 0.3m.

The competition provides SAR 110–130 pricing but our company charges 124 SAR with uptime and SLA as separate paid features.

The system functions through three main features which include active sales playcards that operate within quote rules and communication approval systems and weekly realization and churn data display on the dashboard.

Common pitfalls (and counters)

The initial revenue goals of a project transform into price targets during its execution which leads to ambition creep. The system requires a mechanism to block proposals which fail to meet the five fundamental requirements.

  • Copy-paste uplifts: The same percentage increase applies to all SKUs. The counter strategy involves dividing products into segments based on their value and elasticity levels to protect high-value SKUs and develop different solutions for underperforming products.

The approach of focusing only on costs does not establish pricing authority. The counterargument focuses on the willingness to pay and alternative options.

  • Legal blind spots: Aggressive moves without GAC review. Legal needs to review all high-risk plays before the game to stop coordination problems and the team must explain their thought process behind these choices.

The sales team receives the “+8%” message but they end up giving away too many discounts. Counter: Tools contain guardrails which include approvals and measured realization and tools with guardrails.

Decision tree (quick use)

  • Ambition-led with no evidence → N
  • Evidence-led and all five tests pass → A–B
  • Uncertain → Pilot for 2–4 weeks with instrumentation, then decide.

External reading (≤5 years; includes GCC/KSA)

The McKinsey website delivers information about pricing approaches for 2024 disinflationary times through their article “How to navigate pricing during disinflationary times (2024).” (McKinsey & Company)

BCG — Solving the Pricing Puzzle in Inflationary Times (2023): https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/solving-the-pricing-puzzle-in-inflationary-times  (BCG)

Global Competition Review — Saudi Arabia levies rare predatory pricing fine (2023): https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/saudi-arabia-levies-rare-predatory-pricing-fine

(Global Competition Review)

Strategy& Middle East — GCC insights (2025): https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/thought-leadership-strategy/reports.html(PwC)

Subscribe to Hostinger (web hosting) and get 20% Discount with the following link:

https://hostinger.com?REFERRALCODE=F4NMUSTAFHIS

Posted on

The Pitfalls of Ignoring Customer Willingness to Pay in Innovation Strategy

The Pitfalls of Ignoring Customer Willingness to Pay in Innovation Strategy

Your current innovation efforts produce features which customers refuse to pay for.

Your current pricing strategy would result in zero customer purchases if you launched your new product today. The market education approach you use to predict sales indicates you might be overlooking the fundamental problem of customer willingness to pay. The failure to understand customer willingness to pay leads to the stagnation of innovative products. Innovation leads to profitable growth when you understand customer willingness to pay but it results in publicity without financial gains when you ignore it. This guide provides senior leaders and founders and CEOs with methods to identify WTP risks early and conduct fast WTP tests to develop an innovation system that delivers valuable products customers will fund. (WTP = the maximum a customer will pay for a specific offer.) Harvard Business School Online

Fast takeaways

The price of a product determines its final form. Your product lacks value when customers refuse to make payments.

The job-to-be-done framework provides better insights than traditional demographic analysis. Your design process should focus on the tasks customers need your help with. Christensen Institute, Harvard Business School

The measurement of WTP should be your priority. The correct methods for determining WTP include Van Westendorp and Gabor-Granger and conjoint analysis instead of depending on feelings. Conjointly, Attest

Segment your customers based on their willingness to pay. Customers should determine their payment level through their willingness to pay for specific services. Harvard Business Review

The process of adjusting prices should be ongoing. Value-based pricing outperforms cost-plus pricing and competitor price duplication according to MIT Sloan Management Review.

Great ideas perish when organizations fail to consider customer willingness to pay.

The failure of innovation occurs when the offer fails to match the price and target market segment. Teams create advanced features for budget customers but fail to allocate sufficient resources for premium customers who would pay more for essential outcomes. The outcome leads to price reductions and extended sales periods and costly educational programs that consume financial resources. The measurement of WTP exists as a quantifiable value which changes over time. Your price-value story needs to adapt to market changes because they occur naturally. Retailers and platforms use price testing and segmentation and personalization to determine WTP because this approach delivers results. Harvard Business Review, MIT Sloan Management Review

The following indicators signal that you are disregarding customer willingness to pay:

  • Demo love, deal apathy. People praise the product yet push for deep discounts.
  • CAC creeping up. The price-value alignment is poor so you must purchase customers.
  • Discount ladder dependence. The AE playbooks depend on “save the deal” discount strategies.
  • Tier leakage. The majority of customers select the entry-level package yet they use advanced features that cost more.
  • Roadmap bloat. The addition of new features serves to validate pricing rather than delivering a single essential solution.
  • Vanity metrics. The number of trials and visits appears positive but revenue and gross margin performance remains unsatisfactory.

Three yellow indicators should prompt you to stop feature deployment and conduct pricing research during this week. Systematic pricing methods outperform pricing intuition because they are not optional. MIT Sloan Management Review

A fast and trustworthy method exists to evaluate customer willingness to pay.

1) Begin your analysis with Jobs to Be Done (JTBD).

People use solutions to advance their progress in three main areas which include functional needs and social and emotional requirements. Define the job with precision before identifying essential customer outcomes that lead to payment rewards. The application of JTBD leads to better success rates because you create solutions that match what customers will pay for. Christensen Institute

2) Select research tools that match your current business development level.

The Van Westendorp method provides fast pricing insights through four questions that help determine acceptable price ranges. The method provides initial market direction. Attest

Gabor-Granger directly assesses customer demand at specific price points to create demand curve estimates. Conjointly

The conjoint analysis method allows users to evaluate how customers weigh different features against prices to determine attribute values for creating product packages. Conjointly

3) Validate in the wild.

The testing process requires actual promotional offers that include time-limited price deals and product bundles and restricted access options. Customers should determine their willingness to pay through self-segmentation between good-better-best options. Harvard Business Review

4) Price to value, not cost.

The cost-plus method provides simplicity yet produces incorrect results. The practice of matching prices to competitors represents a lack of effort. Value-based pricing establishes prices based on how customers perceive value and the expenses they must replace. MIT Sloan Management Review

Internal link: The article Understanding Customer Truth: Leveraging Jobs-to-be-Done to Identify Demand Before Building.

https://3msbusiness.cloud/customer-truth-jobs-to-be-done/

Organizations need to develop an innovation system which honors customer willingness to pay.

The product development process should include price as a fundamental element.

The price-setting process for products should be shared between Product Managers and financial experts. The epic documentation requires three essential elements which include target customer segments and their jobs and their willingness-to-pay ranges supported by survey data or testing results or market research analogs.

Institutionalize learning.

The innovation process includes three-month sprints which require teams to develop one testable value enhancement and one packaging modification and one pricing experiment for each cycle.

Stage-gate funding.

The funding process should follow a step-by-step progression from Discover to Validate to Build to Scale with WTP evidence requirements that include achieving 20% conversion at target prices. The system prevents organizations from wasting resources on failed projects. MIT Sloan Management Review

Cross-functional rituals.

The weekly 45-minute review includes JTBD insights and price tests and win/loss notes and a basic dashboard that shows win rate and ARPU and gross margin and CAC/payback metrics.

Ethical personalization.

The practice of offering customized bundles and packages instead of hidden pricing structures remains acceptable when your industry standards and regulatory requirements permit it. (Personalized pricing exists; weigh trust carefully.) Harvard Business Review

B2B SaaS operates as a mini-case study.

The workflow SaaS platform encountered major discounting problems while its payback period reached nine months. The company shifted its focus from adding AI features to finding price-value alignment for their products. The team conducted Van Westendorp surveys with 300 participants followed by Gabor-Granger and conjoint analysis with two different ICP groups. Operations leaders placed greater importance on uptime and audit trail functionality than dashboard features and they would pay 25-35% more for guaranteed service level agreements. The team created new pricing tiers based on reliability features and restricted advanced analytics access while increasing list prices by 12%. The company achieved a 9-point increase in win rate and reduced average discounts from 18% to 8% while shortening CAC payback to 6.5 months and maintaining the same engineering budget for improved gross margin.

Consumer services operate as the second mini-case study.

The wellness center operated under a single pricing system for all customers. The number of trials increased yet the revenue numbers remained unchanged. The company discovered through JTBD interviews that customers performed two main activities: seeking expert coaching before events and wanting affordable maintenance services. The company introduced premium coaching services with human consultation guarantees and basic self-service options for customers. The company used price fences to create bundles which included priority booking and exclusive classes. Customers chose their preferred service level based on their willingness to pay while the low-tier matched their budget needs and premium services delivered the outcomes enthusiasts sought. The revenue per member increased by 17% through strategic pricing without requiring forceful upselling methods. The key takeaway demonstrates that WTP should determine product packaging instead of forcing all customers to use the same pricing structure.

New technologies should be implemented while maintaining focus on the core mission

AI systems can help businesses detect and answer WTP signals more efficiently when they receive appropriate input questions.

The combination of GA4 and Search Console and ad platform data enables businesses to track user queries and segment identification and purchase intention detection.

The testing of offers includes changing bundle names and value statements and price restrictions to measure conversion rates and ARPU across different customer groups.

The system identifies accounts that show price-sensitive behavior through downgrade exploration and usage reduction so it can test retention offers without universal price reductions.

The system tracks competitor product releases and customer feedback to modify WTP assumptions during monthly assessments. The price of a product should be determined by customer value rather than production costs. MIT Sloan Management Review

The following 90-day action plan contains specific steps which you should implement immediately

  1. Write the job. Each ICP requires a single statement which describes the situation and the required solution and the desired outcome.
  2. Define outcomes & metrics. What proves the job is done? (Time saved, uptime, ROI.)
  3. Map price hypotheses. The team should create WTP range estimates for each ICP segment and each pricing level.
  4. Run research. The research sequence begins with Van Westendorp surveys followed by Gabor-Granger or conjoint analysis for more detailed results. Attest, Conjointly
  5. Repackage. The team should organize good-better-best options with distinct boundaries and clear explanations of value. Harvard Business Review
  6. Validate live. The system requires price tests to run with clean cohorts and a predetermined kill date.
  7. Install guardrails. The system includes three essential features which include gross-margin floors and CAC/payback caps and discount authorization limits. MIT Sloan Management Review
  8. Codify the ritual. The company conducts a weekly price-value assessment while creating a monthly document to determine tier and price adjustments and roadmap development.

The following examples show how innovators successfully matched their offerings to customer willingness to pay.

Airlines use their cabin tiers to offer economy and premium and business classes which provide different job experiences for passengers who value them at different levels. (Self-segmentation by value.) Harvard Business Review

The software suite offers modular pricing tiers which block premium features from lower-paying users but enable budget-conscious customers to access entry-level options. The conjoint method determines which features should be placed in each tier. Conjointly

Retailers use A/B testing and personalized offers to determine micro-segment WTP while maintaining customer trust through careful application of these methods. Harvard Business Review

TL;DR

The failure to consider customer willingness to pay creates an innovation barrier. Your innovation process begins with JTBD to create solutions that deliver meaningful value to customers. The measurement of WTP requires Van Westendorp or Gabor-Granger or conjoint analysis followed by tier packaging that enables customers to choose based on value. The pricing strategy should focus on delivering value to customers rather than using cost data or competitor prices and must undergo live testing. The system requires stage-gates along with margin floors and CAC/payback caps for proper governance. The combination of AI systems with analytics tools enables organizations to detect market trends and make swift adjustments. Your innovation engine will operate independently when you implement this approach.

CTA

Identify the point where your price-value narrative fails between tier levels and segment definitions and message delivery and select a WTP test to resolve this issue during the current month.

Hashtags:

#InnovationStrategy #WillingnessToPay #JobsToBeDone #PricingStrategy #ProductLeadership #B2BGrowth #GCCBusiness

Office materials from Amazon:

Duracell - AA 1.5V Alkaline Batteries LR06 / MN1500 Lasts Up to 1...

Duracell – AA 1.5V Alkaline Batteries LR06 / MN1500 Lasts Up to 1…

  • Duracell AA Batteries: The Duracell CopperTop AAA alkaline battery is designed for use in household items like remotes, …
  • Duracell guarantees these batteries against defects in material and workmanship. Should any device be damaged due to a b…
  • Long Lasting Power: Duracell alkaline batteries are designed and developed for long lasting performance.
SAR49.00
Buy on Amazon
INIU Power Bank, 𝟐𝟐.𝟓𝑾 USB C 10000mAh Small Portable Charger, PD3...

INIU Power Bank, 𝟐𝟐.𝟓𝑾 USB C 10000mAh Small Portable Charger, PD3…

  • [From INIU – the SAFE Fast Chage Pro] Experience the safest charging with over 38 million global users. At INIU, we use …
  • [22.5W Speedy Charge] INIU 22.5W power bank combines the most advanced PD 3.0 and QC 4+ fast charging technologies—it in…
  • [Compact as A Card] This incredibly compact body is 17% thinner, 23% smaller, and 38% lighter than its kind. You can eas…
SAR99.99
Buy on Amazon
UGREEN Revodok USB C Hub with 100W PD Charging [Braided Cable], T...

UGREEN Revodok USB C Hub with 100W PD Charging [Braided Cable], T…

  • 【5-in-1 USB C Hub 】1*4K HDMI Port, 1*PD 100W Charging Port, 1*USB 3.0 Ports, 2*USB 3.0 Ports. All ports can work simulta…
  • 【100W USB-C PD Adapter】：This Macbook USB C Hub with upgraded smart chip, USB C charging port can deliver up to 100W of p…
  • 【4K@30Hz High-Resolution HDMI Adapter】: Simply connect with the Type c to Hdmi port and you can project UHD 4K@30Hz or F…
SAR71.90
Buy on Amazon
Posted on

Three Key Steps for Executives in a Successful Turnaround Strategy

Three Key Steps for Executives in a Successful Turnaround Strategy

For busy execs

  • Stabilize: Win the next 13 weeks—cash triage, price discipline, zero-based spend, and procurement waves.
  • Simplify: Make hard choices—prune SKUs, shut zombie projects, and choose one strategic position (cost leadership, differentiation, or focus). Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School
  • Scale: Double down on the few capabilities that create advantage; build a cadence that turns strategy into results. MIT Sloan Management Review

The governance structure includes war-room meetings alongside weekly KPI tracking and a 30-60-90 plan which requires named owners.

  • Outcome: Liquidity bought, noise reduced, flywheel spinning.

The moment of truth

If you are reading this, odds are your dashboard looks “fine” … until it does not. The revenue numbers seem decent yet margin performance continues to decline. Projects slip “just a week,” then another. Discounts creep in. The financial strain becomes visible at the same time the board demands an immediate plan.

The guide serves as my practical approach to working with founders and CEOs and CFOs and COOs and senior teams through Stabilize, Simplify, Scale. It is blunt by design. When the house is smoky, you do not discuss paint colors—you grab the extinguisher, then rebuild the kitchen.

1) Stabilize: Buy time and control the bleeding

The main goal is to maintain operational continuity and defend personnel and clients while obtaining sufficient time for making genuine strategic decisions.

A cash war room (daily for 13 weeks).

Create a 13-week financial plan that includes detailed tracking of receivables by their age and critical payables along with payroll costs and tax expenses and debt servicing requirements. Perform daily reconciliation while acting during the afternoon hours. Your collections efforts should combine executive-to-executive debt collection with payment strategy development for optimizing payment sequences while eliminating automatic renewal contracts. McKinsey & Company demonstrates in their research that strong working-capital strategies both generate funding for the turnaround and decrease survival threats. McKinsey & Company

  1. b) Procurement waves that print cash.

Implement 4–6-week sourcing waves for your largest external spending areas which include logistics together with MRO and SaaS services. Organizations should implement standardized specifications and rebid procedures to bundle their volumes while setting “should-cost” targets. The correct execution of procurement operations provides organizations with quick cash flow without negatively affecting their customer base. McKinsey & Company

  1. c) Price and discount discipline.

Freeze ad-hoc discounting. A discount approval system should include commercial finance signatures for all price reductions above 3% along with “give-get” rules that allow discounts only when customers obtain extended payment terms and larger orders and prepayment agreements. The implementation of clear rules brings back margin integrity quickly.

  1. d) Zero-based spend.

Every organization should begin its operations from a blank slate before validating each financial decision. The 20% portion that generates 80% of value should be retained but delay the remaining 80% for 90 days. The process of decision-making represents emergency care operations rather than standard financial management.

  1. e) Communicate like a leader.

Tell your teams the truth. The 30-60-90 plan requires names together with numbers and dates. Momentum beats perfection.

The team gets a winning signal when it achieves positive weekly net cash flow together with decreasing days sales outstanding and a discounted rate that has been reduced by half and staff members who understand the situation.

2) Simplify: Focus beats complexity

The primary goal is to eliminate unnecessary distractions which will allow leaders to focus on their most important strategic initiatives.

  1. a) Choose your strategic position (and own the trade-offs).

Strategy is not “do everything better.” A business should select a distinctive market approach by designing activities that support it which requires turning down enticing yet unaligned opportunities. Porter’s work is unambiguous: cost leadership, differentiation, or focus. Pick one. The organization should create an integrated system which supports this strategic choice. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School

  1. b) Use the BCG matrix to prune the portfolio.

Products/business units should be displayed in a matrix based on market growth and relative share position which identifies Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs. The company should eliminate Dogs through harvesting and fund Stars simultaneously while establishing challenging learning targets for Question Marks and maintain Cash Cows by preventing resource depletion for innovative activities. The tool has existed for fifty years because leaders always need to assess their limited resource distribution. Boston Consulting Group

  1. c) Scrap the zombie projects.

A project should be shut down if it fails to define customer promises and paths to advantage and profit metrics that deliver results within 2–3 quarters. Move A-players from failing projects to successful ones.

  1. d) Simplify operating model.

The three-column one-page format should contain the following elements: Centralized decisions (pricing guardrails and capital allocation) and decisions made at the edge (local assortment and project staffing) and standardized interfaces (data model and CRM stages and cost codes). Less handoffs and faster cycle times and clearer accountability.

  1. e) Rebuild the scorecard.

For turnarounds, vanity metrics are poison. Track:

  • Cash conversion (cash from ops / EBITDA)
  • Net revenue retention (B2B) or repeat rate (B2C)
  • Unit economics (contribution margin per SKU/project)
  • Cycle time (quote-to-cash, install-to-invoice)
  • Rework / call-backs (construction/field services)

When the scoreboard changes, behavior changes.

3) Scale: Institutionalize what works

Objective: Make the early wins repeatable and build capabilities that compound.

  1. a) Turn strategy into a weekly cadence.

Strategy only “exists” when it shows up in calendars, budgets, and one-number priorities. Use a simple loop: weekly ops (execution), monthly business review (learning), quarterly reset (choices). Research on execution shows sustained results come from tight alignment between priorities, metrics, and behaviors. MIT Sloan Management Review

  1. b) Capability roadmap (not a feature wishlist).

Choose three to five capabilities that form your competitive advantage by selecting rapid design-to-quote capabilities and data-driven pricing and supply-chain reliability at 95%+ OTIF then develop the necessary technology and processes and roles and skills to execute these capabilities. According to McKinsey & Company’s current advice businesses should start their transformation by defining a clear “true north” while developing four essential workstreams that will sustain the process. McKinsey & Company

  1. c) Culture that accelerates, not decorates.

You do not need posters—you need behaviors. The leadership team at LEGO created new behaviors which they embedded into their systems and rituals to drive years of successful growth and profitable results. That is the point: culture is how decisions get made when no one is watching. MIT Sloan Management Review

  1. d) Smart M&A (if relevant).

A disciplined operator remains the only one who achieves success when buying troubled assets. MIT Sloan Management Review states that several key factors lead to better M&A turnaround results; organizations should only proceed with acquisitions when they meet these criteria. MIT Sloan Management Review

  1. e) Fit-for-growth costs.

The allocation of funds should proceed from unnecessary items to essential capabilities. The approach described by Strategy& as Fit for Growth focuses on advantageous reallocation instead of cost reduction. (PwC)

Two fast case studies

Case 1 — “LEGO’s Rebuild Play” (real-world lesson):

LEGO regained its focus by returning to core capabilities while simplifying its portfolio and establishing clear leadership behaviors. Cultural change served as an operational driver instead of being a superficial catchphrase that required codification and reinforcement. After this period the company implemented a new operating model that included both product and process improvements. MIT Sloan Management Review

Case 2 — “HVAC contractor, KSA” (composite):

The company operated at SAR 38 million in revenue with a negative 6% operating margin and rework at 14% while LDs applied to 22% of projects.

The solution includes a 13-week cash war room together with collections taskforce implementation and ad-hoc discount reduction and procurement wave deployment for compressors/controls along with marketing program suspension for low-ROI activities.

Simplify operations through a portfolio review which removes unprofitable retrofit SKUs and selects focus differentiation through 24-hour emergency response and no-callback guarantee while standardizing job costing and closeout checklists.

A training program for foremen should focus on right-first-time while introducing earned-value tracking and launching repeat-service plans for commercial clients.

The company achieved financial positivity during the 180-day period and reduced rework to 6% while reaching near breakeven operating margin levels with maintenance contracts making up most of the pipeline.

The 30-60-90 plan (use this tomorrow)

Days 0–30 — STABILIZE

  • Stand up 13-week cash; daily reconcile; CFO + treasury lead.
  • Collections sprint; CXO-to-CXO calls for top 20 debtors.
  • Freeze discounts; install approval fences.
  • Launch Wave 1 procurement (top 3 indirect categories).
  • Publish “Stop/Start/Continue” list; cut noncritical spend.
  • All-hands: 10-minute truth talk and weekly scorecard ritual.

Days 31–60 — SIMPLIFY

  • Choose strategic position (cost leadership / differentiation / focus).The BCG matrix requires companies to shut down Dogs and harvest Cows while funding Stars while implementing time-boxes for Question Marks. Boston Consulting Group
  • Operating model: decision rights map, standardized CRM/cost codes, handoff rules.

The 20 top SKUs and projects should be re-costed for unit economics while negative-margin offers should be removed.

  • Talent: reassign A-players to Stars; exit chronic blockers.

Days 61–90 — SCALE

The Revenue engine has two choices: account expansion plays or high-velocity small deals which must be selected.

KPIs that matter in a turnaround

  • Cash: net cash from ops (weekly), DSO/DBO, inventory turns
  • Margin integrity: realized price vs. list, discount rate, contribution margin
  • Execution: quote-to-cash cycle time, on-time delivery/installation, rework %
  • Demand health: pipeline coverage (x months), win rate, NRR or repeat rate
  • People: regrettable attrition, % roles with named successors

The scorecard should be limited to one page while green indicates on-plan status and red signals immediate action.

Content enrichment: external references you can trust

FAQs leaders ask (and straight answers)

“Can we ‘do it all’—be low cost and premium?”

No. Your business will move into a middle ground that results in competition from both directions. You should select one path to develop an integrated system of supporting choices. Harvard Business Review

“Should we buy growth during a turnaround?”

Your company should purchase growth only when you possess the organizational capacity to combine and correct operations within critical timeframes. When you acquire someone else’s business, you will only get the existing problems. MIT Sloan Management Review

“How much cost should we cut?”

Wrong question. Your resources should be allocated toward a limited number of distinct capabilities which differentiate your business. Avoid spending money on initiatives that do not drive your business strategy forward. PwC

Final word

Turnarounds reward courage and punish indecision. Stabilize to buy time. Simplify to regain strategic clarity. Scale to create momentum and keep it. You require neither perfect data to begin nor a leader who can make tough decisions but you do need someone who will lead the team to execute tasks with precision. Three months of executing this way will activate the flywheel.

Desktop Computer for office:

https://amzn.to/4myv7Rc

https://amzn.to/4g5OOgX

https://amzn.to/4p9ETey

https://amzn.to/461gZcu

https://amzn.to/3HOsR9x

Posted on

Pricing Foundations: Price Architecture – Build Tiers That Sell Themselves

Pricing Foundations: Price Architecture – Build Tiers That Sell Themselves

Introduction: Why Pricing Architecture Shapes Your Growth

The actual value of a price extends beyond numerical figures because it represents the psychological connection and strategic approach and trust foundations that define your business model. Founders and CEOs and CFOs can reach sustainable growth and profitability by mastering Pricing Foundations where Price Architecture stands as their most powerful strategic tool.

Price operates as a continuous dialog that exists between your business organization and market participants. Strategic tier systems operate as directional signs which direct customers to their suitable options at the same time as they maximize profit. Price architecture requires deliberate construction of pricing tiers which naturally draw customers in while promoting them to choose more expensive options without forceful sales tactics.

What Is Price Architecture?

Businesses establish price architecture as a systematic framework for creating pricing segments which unite customer selection with revenue targets. Businesses design value-based pathways to guide buyers toward their best choice while achieving strategic revenue targets.

The introduction of tiered pricing includes three levels which are Basic, Pro and Enterprise.

The anchoring method positions a price to create better value perceptions in other options.

The Decoy Effect uses an unappealing alternative to steer customers toward selecting higher-value tiers.

Value demonstration presents clear explanations that show why premium options are worth their cost.

The McKinsey research shows that active price strategy management leads to profit growth between 2–7% which frequently determines whether a business achieves stability or rapid expansion.

Why Tiered Pricing Works

Tiered pricing stands as a successful strategy because it matches how customers decide on their purchases. Although customers lack knowledge about “fair value,” they naturally recognize when prices compare to one another. By offering structured tiers, you:

1.         Offer selection through multiple options that avoid overwhelming customers best when using three or four tiers.

2.         Segment the market – Different tiers capture different willingness to pay.

3.         Encourage upgrades – Gaps in features or benefits push customers toward higher-value options.

4.         Build trust – Transparent tiers reduce friction and signal confidence.

Tiered pricing models used by businesses lead to conversion rates that surpass flat pricing models by up to 30% according to Harvard Business Review.

Key Components of Strong Price Architecture

Strong pricing architecture rests on a few critical elements.

Anchoring and the Power of Contrast

New York Times uses effective anchoring through its digital subscription options: Basic Digital ($4/month), Standard ($6/month), and Premium ($8/month). The Premium option appears affordable to users because Standard serves as the reference point while offering substantial value for a larger price.

Value Mapping

Shift the conversation from features to outcomes. In B2B SaaS, for example:

•          Basic = “Get started with automation.”

•          Pro = “Save 10+ hours each week.”

•          Enterprise = “Scale with compliance and advanced security.”

The Decoy Effect in Action

Case Study: Economist Subscription Experiment

•          Online: $59

•          Print: $125

•          Print + Online: $125

Customers picked the Print + Online bundle since the decoy middle option created a false impression that it was the best value.

Freemium vs. Paid Tiers

Dropbox demonstrates this perfectly. Millions of users register for free storage but clear upgrade paths lead power users to become paid subscribers.

Real-World Case Studies

Slack – From Freemium to Enterprise

The company Slack started by providing free plans to small groups and then expanded its offerings with Pro and Business+ before creating Enterprise Grid for business users within regulated industries. Slack achieved massive growth because its pricing structure provided solutions to both startups and Fortune 500 companies.

HubSpot – Aligning Pricing With Growth

HubSpot transitioned its pricing model into Starter Professional and Enterprise tiers that matched customer development levels. Through its pricing model alignment with customer growth stages HubSpot achieved double-digit annual expansion revenue.

Apple – Anchoring at Its Finest

Apple maintains a “Pro” segment throughout its iPhone product range. The display of a $1,200 model makes the $999 version appear affordable despite its premium pricing. Billions in upsell revenue flow from this anchoring approach.

Certifications, Awards, and Industry Validation

Numbers alone don’t establish trust. The combination of third-party endorsements together with industry approvals serves to validate premium pricing and build trust with customers.

•          ISO 9001 Certification – Signals operational excellence.

•          G2, Gartner, Forrester Reports – Provide SaaS validation.

•          Best Workplace & Innovation Awards – Showcase leadership in talent and innovation.

The CXL Institute discovered that placing certification badges on price pages increases conversion rates by 15–20%.

Data-Driven Pricing: AI & Analytics

Pricing operations in the modern market change continuously due to analysis and artificial intelligence. Organizations that lead their industries implement technological tools to perform price architecture testing while monitoring performance and conducting price refinements.

Key Tools to Implement

•          Google Analytics 4 (GA4) – Monitors funnel performance by tier.

Hotjar together with FullStory show how customers interact with your pricing page.

The brandwatch and Sprout Social platforms monitor customer reactions to pricing adjustments.

Gong and Clari systems deliver revenue intelligence and help businesses understand customer objections about pricing.

Bain & Company discovered that organizations using data-driven dynamic pricing methods achieve between 5% to 8% higher profit margin.

How to Build Tiers That Sell Themselves

Step 1 – Define Customer Segments

The tier structure should correspond to different customer groups such as startups and mid-market and enterprise organizations based on their requirements and financial capabilities.

Step 2 – Create Value Differentiation

Each pricing tier must provide enhanced value beyond the basic features available to lower tiers.

Step 3 – Apply Behavioral Psychology

The decision-making process should be directed through the combination of anchoring techniques and framing strategies and bundling methods.

Step 4 – Add Proof Points

Your pricing page should display case studies together with testimonials and certifications to support your value proposition.

Step 5 – Continuously Test and Optimize

Perform A/B tests to evaluate tier names along with pricing layout structures and points. The system should utilize AI-driven dashboards for result measurement.

External Resources

Harvard Business Review: Pricing Strategies

McKinsey Insights on Pricing

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1.         Offering too many tiers → Confuses buyers.

2.         Locking features without clear value → Feels manipulative.

3.         Ignoring feedback → Prices must evolve with the market.

4.         Hiding your best option → Place your most profitable tier in the middle, where customers naturally gravitate.

Conclusion – Pricing as a Growth Engine

Your pricing page functions as an active salesperson rather than an unchangeable price listing. A well-designed price architecture enables you to lead customers toward the most beneficial option which also maximizes your revenue.

The most prosperous businesses maintain pricing as an active strategy that receives continuous improvement through data analysis combined with psychological principles and trust-based methods. By establishing pricing tiers that promote themselves you will establish a continuous revenue stream.

Key Takeaway

Price architecture goes beyond numbers. A pricing system that uses smart tier structures and behavioral psychology and AI performance tracking will sell itself to generate sustainable profitability.

Amazon products for Offices:

https://amzn.to/4mjq8DQ

https://amzn.to/41dvc4h

https://amzn.to/4owzwpg

Posted on

Understanding Customer Truth: Leveraging Jobs-to-be-Done to Identify Demand Before Building

Understanding Customer Truth: Leveraging Jobs-to-be-Done to Identify Demand Before Building

Business Innovation Begins With Customer Understanding (Not Code)

As founders and CEOs and CFOs the difficult reality shows that engineering failures are less common than developing solutions for markets that do not exist. The primary cause of startup closure according to post-mortem analyses is the absence of market need which proves that speculation remains the costliest component of innovation. (CB Insights)

The practical approach of Jobs-to-Be-Done (JTBD) helps businesses discover market demand prior to product development. Your focus shifts to customer progress goals during specific situations rather than personas and feature development. Identifying the job provides you with better investment decisions and accelerated sales processes while generating more customer payment willingness. The article “Know Your Customers’ ‘Jobs to Be Done’” in Harvard Business Review serves as a fundamental primer. (Harvard Business Review)

JTBD, Explained: What Customers Really “Hire” You To Do

Customers purchase products because these items help them accomplish tasks such as faster commuting and presentation confidence and sleep through the night. Great innovations map to those jobs. The famous “milkshake” example shows how reframing the problem (a morning commuter’s hunger gap) led to a winning product tweak—without chasing demographics or vanity features. (Harvard Business Review)

Why this matters to leadership

  • CEOs receive improved strategic statements which directly stem from genuine market requirements.
  • CFOs observe capital allocation which directly corresponds to specific jobs along with measurable outcomes.
  • Founders/COOs should eliminate scope expansion because any element which does not advance the job gets eliminated.

A Practical, 5-Step JTBD Market Test (30–60 Days)

Step 1 — Collect “Switch Stories” (Week 1)

You should conduct interviews with new customers who purchased from you or your competitors during the previous months. Ask them about their struggle at that moment and the factors which triggered their search as well as the limitations they faced and the trade-offs they made. Each interview should last between 30-45 minutes and you should record the exact statements while creating a timeline that shows the progression from first thought to passive search to active search to decision to consumption. The product team at Intercom shared their experiences of using “switch” interviews for product development alongside go-to-market strategies. (Intercom)

Step 2 — Write Clear Job & Outcome Statements (Week 1–2)

The collected interview data should be transformed into:

  • Core Job Statement: A statement that includes a verb followed by an object and context (e.g., “Confirm a new vendor is compliant before first invoice”).
  • Desired Outcomes: The measurable criteria which customers use to evaluate their progress (e.g., shorten document verification time while enhancing sanction check accuracy).

The Outcome-Driven Innovation (ODI) framework uses its structured approach to both document and measure outcomes so businesses can detect unmet customer needs. (Note: the 86% “success rate” often quoted is vendor-reported from Strategyn’s own study.) (Strategyn)

Step 3 — Segment by Circumstances, Not Personas (Week 2)

Organize potential customers based on the situations they face (first enterprise audit, new market entry, merger clean-up) and the restrictions they encounter (security reviews, procurement, integrations). The importance of this method lies in the fact that job requirements change based on circumstances instead of focusing on who the buyer is because their current task is more vital. (Harvard Business Review)

Step 4 — Prototype the Promise (Weeks 3–4)

Create two competing value propositions from the job description and outcomes by following this process:

  • Variant A: Optimize for speed to progress (e.g., “Deploy in 1 day, slash time-to-verify 50%”).
  • Variant B: Optimize for confidence/risk reduction (e.g., “Audit-ready evidence, 99.9% accuracy”).

Use landing pages along with demos and ROI calculators as the only lightweight assets you should deploy. This test focuses on determining how much demand exists for the promise instead of evaluating your full product.

Step 5 — Instrument the Evidence (Weeks 3–6)

Use Google Analytics 4 (GA4) to capture event-level signals across the funnel (e.g., clicked schedule-demo, watched 50% of demo video, pricing page viewed, proposal opened). GA4’s event model and recommended events make this straightforward to implement via Google Tag or GTM. (Google Help, Google for Developers)

The addition of brand monitoring through Brandwatch enables you to monitor mention volume and sentiment while tracking the share of voice (SOV) against two competitors to evaluate how your narrative performs. (Brandwatch)

What to Measure: Executive-Level Signals

Leading indicators (weeks)

  • Qualified pipeline velocity: time from first touch → first meeting.
  • Value-prop lift: Variant A vs. B conversion rates to meeting/demo.
  • Time-to-first value (TTFV): from onboarding → first outcome achieved.
  • Early SOV & sentiment: share of conversation versus baseline. (Brandwatch)

Lagging indicators (quarters)

  • Win-rate by circumstance (job context).
  • Sales cycle days and discount rate (pricing power proxy).
  • Net revenue retention (does the job expand?).
  • “No market need” in closed-lost reasons (should trend down). (CB Insights)

Case Studies & Proof Points (To Learn From)

HBR’s Milkshake Case: Redefining Competition

The team found milkshakes competed with bananas and bagels when they analyzed the commuter’s job of satisfying mid-morning hunger without creating a mess. The new perspective drove product specifications and channel strategies that resulted in better sales without the need to pursue new customer personas. (Harvard Business Review)

Intercom & Switch Interviews: Operationalizing JTBD

Intercom made the “switch” interview famous through their efforts to transform onboarding processes and define feature development. The public materials from this vendor explain methods to discover triggers and anxieties and desired outcomes which result in products customers will choose to “hire.” (Vendor resources, still highly instructive.) (Intercom)

Outcome-Driven Innovation (ODI): Quantifying Demand

The JTBD process of ODI enables organizations to create a quantifiable pipeline of opportunities through importance vs. satisfaction scoring which reveals unserved customer needs. The reported success rates and uplift statistics originate mainly from Strategyn’s publications yet serve as useful vendor-sourced information that needs evaluation. (Strategyn)

Governance & Trust: Certifications and Awards That Signal Rigor

ISO 56002 (Innovation Management — Guidance) represents an established framework for designing and operating innovation systems which also supports their continuous enhancement. Using ISO 56002 to align your JTBD process will enhance both executive and board member trust. (ISO)

The ISO 56001:2024 (Innovation Management — Requirements) standard provides auditable requirements for organizations that wish to receive certifications as standards evolve. (ISO)

The Edison Awards offer independent validation for market impact after your solution reaches the market. You should consider nomination only after demonstrating proof of adoption and achieving specific outcomes. (edisonawards.com)

Your JTBD Analytics Stack (AI-Driven & CFO-Friendly)

Core telemetry

  • GA4 (events + DebugView): instrument “micro-yes” steps (scrolls, pricing views, calculator completions, demo requests). (Google Help, Google for Developers)
  • Brand monitoring (Brandwatch): monitor mentions, sentiment, and SOV; set anomaly alerts for spikes tied to launches or PR. (Brandwatch)

Decision cadence

  • Weekly: review Variant A/B funnel and message-market resonance.
  • Monthly: update job/outcome scores; decide kill / scale thresholds.
  • Quarterly: fold validated jobs into roadmap, pricing, and sales enablement.

Implementation Blueprint (90 Days)

Days 1–15: Discover the Jobs

  • 10–15 switch interviews across won, lost, and churned customers.
  • Draft 1–2 job statements and 10–20 desired outcomes per job.
  • Prioritize 2 circumstances where your odds to win are highest.

Days 16–45: Test the Promise

  • Build two landing pages (A: speed-to-progress; B: risk-reduction).
  • Establish GA4 events (view_pricing, start_checkout/“book_demo”), track the path from source to meeting. (Google for Developers)
  • Begin monitoring brand trends for category terms and competitors while monitoring the Share of Voice pattern. (Brandwatch)

Days 46–90: Operationalize the Winner

  • Productize one high-impact outcome (e.g., a prebuilt integration that removes a top struggle).
  • Enable Sales with “When to hire us vs. alternatives” talk track.
  • Create a Trust & Innovation page that demonstrates ISO alignment alongside data handling and uptime/SLA policies while preparing an Edison Awards submission after customers show measurable outcomes. (ISO)

Thought Leadership: Earn the Right to Lead Your Category

Executives reward brands that teach with evidence. Publish:

A JTBD Benchmark Report (aggregate, anonymized outcomes & time-to-value) presents combined and anonymous performance metrics and the speed at which value is achieved.

A CEO/CFO Guide to funding bets by jobs instead of features (with GA4 screenshots and SOV trendlines).

A Field Playbook: interview guides + scoring templates aligned to ISO 56002 elements. (ISO)

The following suggestions outline both internal and external link options.

Internal (lead-gen focused)

The services section of the website contains two main subpages: JTBD Research which describes interview procedures and outcome measurement while the JTBD Interview Kit page provides a script for interviews along with consent and analysis template.

The resources section contains the JTBD Interview Kit which includes interview scripts and consent forms and analysis templates.

The innovation section of the website provides content about trust which explains ISO 56002 alignment and governance structures along with process maps.

The case-studies/ section contains data about demand discovery successes which can be tracked through segment and circumstance analysis.

External (authority)

The executive primer in HBR explains the importance of understanding what “Jobs to Be Done” means to customers. (Harvard Business Review)

The ISO provides 56002 guidance and 56001 requirements for innovation governance. (ISO)

Google provides step-by-step instructions for GA4 event setup and instrumentation. (Google Help, Google for Developers)

Brandwatch provides comprehensive guides about share of voice and brand monitoring which track demand signals. (Brandwatch)

The startup failure analysis from CB Insights demonstrates why market need assessment should be conducted in the early stages. (CB Insights)

Why This Positions You as a Thought Leader

Your approach to innovation goes beyond feature delivery because you use evidence to reduce risk during product development. Product, sales and finance teams share the JTBD language which works alongside ISO 56002/56001 governance and GA4 and brand monitoring provides real-time signals and external awards validate your impact. The combination of these elements creates board-level trust and market buyer confidence. (ISO, Brandwatch)

Ready to Put This to Work? (Conversion CTA)

Book a Customer Truth Sprint. We will conduct switch interviews and establish GA4 + brand monitoring while developing two tested value propositions through a 90-day roadmap and board-ready brief within 2-3 weeks.

TL;DR (Key Takeaway)

Find demand before you build. Start by using JTBD to discover actual jobs which you can convert into measurable results before testing two promises through fast evaluation. Use GA4 events together with brand monitoring for instrumentation while following ISO 56002/56001 for governance standards and validate your achievements through external recognition. This method enables founders and CEOs and CFOs to transform innovation into revenue with assurance. (Google Help, Brandwatch, ISO)

eBooks to read for executives: CEO, CFO, COO, Founder, and Co-founder:

https://amzn.to/45kVXGr

https://amzn.to/4fDcxoF

https://amzn.to/4oFHJaH

https://amzn.to/45OAfLb

https://amzn.to/4oFjBFk